PM Proofreading
Level 41, Vista Tower, Intermark,
Jln Tun Razak, 50400 KL
Work Hours
Daily: 10AM - 7PM

For decades, the biggest fear for a postgraduate student in Malaysia was “Plagiarism.” You worried about accidentally copying a sentence from a journal article. You worried about your Similarity Index exceeding the 20% threshold set by universities like UM, USM, and UiTM.
But in 2026, the game has changed.
Now, you face a “Dual Threat.” You must lower your Similarity Index without raising your AI Writing Score.
This is where most students fail. They use “Spinning Tools” (like Quillbot or Spinbot) to lower their similarity, only to find their thesis flagged with a Purple Flag (AI-Paraphrased) by Turnitin. They traded one problem for a much worse one.
This comprehensive guide is your roadmap. We will teach you the art of Ethical Paraphrasing—a manual, intellectual process that lowers similarity, bypasses AI detection, and actually improves the quality of your academic writing.
To survive your Viva Voce, you need to understand the two separate scorecards your examiner is holding.
This measures textual matching.
This measures statistical patterns (Perplexity and Burstiness).
The Trap: Many students try to fix the Similarity Score by asking ChatGPT to “rewrite this.”
There is a massive difference between “Spinning” and “Paraphrasing.”
Spinning is replacing words with synonyms while keeping the sentence structure identical.
Ethical paraphrasing involves reading the original text, understanding the core concept, and explaining it from a new angle or combining it with other sources.
Not all rewriting is created equal. At PM Proofreading, we train our editors on four distinct levels.
We cannot stress this enough: Do not rely solely on automated tools.
In our extensive testing, we found that tools like Quillbot (even on “Academic Mode”) leave digital fingerprints.
However, these tools can be used as a starting point—IF you have a human editor review the output.
Let’s look at a real example from a Management Thesis.
The Original Source (Similarity 100%):
“Employee engagement is defined as a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. Engagement is not a momentary and specific state, but rather, it refers to a more persistent and pervasive affective-cognitive state that is not focused on any particular object, event, individual, or behavior.” (Schaufeli et al., 2002).
The “Lazy” Paraphrase (Still fails):
“Worker involvement is defined as a good, satisfying state of mind related to work, shown by energy, dedication, and absorption. It is not just for a moment, but is a long-lasting state…”
- Verdict: Similarity 60%. AI Score 100%.
The “PM Proofreading” Method (Passes):
“Schaufeli et al. (2002) conceptualized employee engagement not as a fleeting emotion, but as a sustained cognitive and emotional state. They argue that true engagement is marked by three core dimensions: vigor, dedication, and absorption, representing a pervasive mindset rather than a reaction to a specific event.”
- Verdict: Similarity 0%. AI Score 0%.
Why the second one works:
“But I’m an engineer! I can’t change the names of the chemicals!”
This is a common complaint. In STEM fields (Engineering, Medicine, IT), you cannot paraphrase “Sulphuric Acid” or “Neural Network.”
The Strategy: Change the “Connecting Logic”, not the “Nouns.”
By changing the verbs (heated -> underwent thermal treatment) and the sentence structure, you break the similarity string while keeping the scientific facts 100% accurate.
Sometimes, paraphrasing is a mistake. You should use Direct Quotes when:
Tip: Use direct quotes sparingly. Too many quotes will lower your “Academic Writing” score in the examiner’s rubric.
If you are staring at a 45% Similarity Report and a 60% AI Score, you might feel overwhelmed. Rewriting 20,000 words manually is a massive task.
This is where PM Proofreading comes in. We offer a specialized Academic Paraphrasing Service that is different from standard editing.
What we do:
Formatting your margins and heading styles is only the first phase of the IPS (Institute of Postgraduate Studies) technical check. Before your university officially accepts your Notice of Submission (NOS) or allows you to proceed to your VIVA defense, you must also submit a Turnitin Originality Report generated by your supervisor or the library.
This is obligatory!
But what percentage is actually considered as “safe”? The exact threshold varies slightly depending on your faculty (Engineering and Law often have different allowances due to technical jargon and and terms), Malaysian universities generally follow strict plagiarism policies.
Here is the standard breakdown of Turnitin similarity score ranges and what they mean for your thesis submission:
A score in this range means your document is highly original. However, for a Master’s or PhD thesis (which typically ranges from 40,000 to 80,000 words), a score near 0% is actually quite rare and sometimes suspicious. It can indicate that the Turnitin filters were manipulated or that essential academic phrases, block quotes, and the bibliography were entirely excluded. If you naturally achieve a score under 10% with your bibliography included, your manuscript is in excellent condition for submission. Congrats!
This is the sweet spot for postgraduate researchers in Malaysia. The vast majority of top-tier public universities consider a similarity index of under 20% to be the standard baseline for passing the technical check. In this level, the matches are usually just common academic phraseology, methodological terminology, and correctly cited references.
If your score lands in the 20s, you are in a gray area zone. Some institutions, like Universiti Sains Malaysia (IPS USM) or specific social science faculties at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), may accept a thesis up to 25% or 30%, in the condition that the matches are mostly concentrated in the Literature Review or Methodology chapters. However, submitting a thesis with a 28% score is risky. Many supervisors will reject the draft and mandate that you utilize an Academic Paraphrasing Service to rewrite the flagged sections before they will sign off on it.
A score in the 30s will almost always trigger a red flag during the IPS technical check. In this stage, Turnitin is detecting significant chunks of copied text, what many universities refer to as “patchwriting” (swapping a few synonyms but keeping the original sentence structure as is). Graduate schools will generally reject the manuscript, delay your VIVA, or just send the document back for extensive manual rewriting.
Scores exceeding 40% are considered academic misconduct by university ethics committees. Submitting a draft with this level of overlapping text can lead to disciplinary action, a failed technical check, or even a complete rejection of your research! Be careful. If your initial draft generates a score this high, you must completely restructure the literature and background chapters.
In Malaysia, your overall percentage is not the only number that matters. Even if your total Turnitin score is a beautiful 14%, you will still fail the IPS check if a single source accounts for more than 3% to 5% of that total. Universities enforce this “Single Source Limit” to prevent students from lifting entire sub-chapters from a single previously published journal article or a senior’s thesis. If you notice a single color-coded source dominating your Turnitin report at 6% or 7%, you must isolate and rewrite that specific section before submitting it to the graduate school.
Achieving a low Turnitin score is not about “tricking” the system. It is about demonstrating that you have processed the information and made it your own.
When you paraphrase ethically, you are doing the actual work of a researcher: Synthesis. You are taking raw information and turning it into knowledge in your own personal voice and writing style.
Don’t risk a “Major Correction” or a “Plagiarism Hearing.”
It depends on how you do the paraphrasing. If you use automated spinners like Quillbot, Turnitin’s 2026 algorithms can often detect the “unnatural syntax” patterns and still flag them as AI-generated. However, manual, deep paraphrasing where you completely restructure the sentence, change the voice (e.g., passive to active), and add specific Malaysian context, is the most effective way to lower both the Similarity Index and the AI Score both at the same time.
While every university differs, the general standard for public universities like UM, USM, and UPM is a Similarity Index of less than 20% or 25%. However, strict faculties may require each individual source match to be under 1%. It is crucial to check your faculty’s specific “Turnitin Threshold Policy” before submission, as a score of 15% could still fail if 10% comes from a single source.
In 2026, most Malaysian universities categorize the unedited use of AI paraphrasers as “AI-assisted plagiarism” or “patchwriting.” If you simply copy-paste a paragraph into a tool and submit the result, you are bypassing the cognitive process of writing. However, using these tools as a thesaurus to find better words while manually constructing your own sentences is generally accepted as a legitimate writing aid.
Patchwriting is a common mistake where a student deletes a few words or swaps synonyms but keeps the original sentence structure intact. Turnitin detects this easily. True paraphrasing involves reading the source, closing the book, and rewriting the concept entirely in your own voice and sentence structure. True paraphrasing demonstrates understanding; patchwriting demonstrates concealment.
Be careful. This is called “Self-Plagiarism.” If you have published a journal article and want to include it in your thesis, you cannot just copy-paste it unless your university allows a “Thesis by Publication” format. Otherwise, you must cite yourself and significantly rewrite (paraphrase) the text to fit the new context of the thesis chapter. This ensures you don’t violate the copyright of the journal that published your paper.